Quorum quenching: role of nanoparticles as signal jammers in Gram-negative bacteria

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Schuster M, Joseph Sexton D, Diggle SP, Peter Greenberg E. Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing: from evolution to application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 43–63 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Rasko DA, Sperandio V. Anti-virulence strategies to combat bacteria-mediated disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9(2), 117 (2010). •• Provides an overview of the strategies that can be used to counter bacterial infections.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Persson T, Givskov M, Nielsen J. Quorum sensing inhibition: targeting chemical communication in gramnegative bacteria. Curr. Med. Chem. 12(26), 3103–3115 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Cegelski L, Marshall GR, Eldridge GR, Hultgren SJ. The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6(1), 17 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Clatworthy AE, Pierson E, Hung DT. Targeting virulence: a new paradigm for antimicrobial therapy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3(9), 541 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Colino C, Millán C, Lanao J. Nanoparticles for signaling in biodiagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(6), 1627 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 7 Hentzer M, Givskov M. Pharmacological inhibition of quorum sensing for the treatment of chronic bacterial infections. J. Clin. Invest. 112(9), 1300–1307 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Lesic B, Lépine F, Déziel E et al. Inhibitors of pathogen intercellular signals as selective anti-infective compounds. PLoS Pathog. 3(9), e126 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 9 Raffa RB, Iannuzzo JR, Levine DR et al. Bacterial communication (“quorum sensing”) via ligands and receptors: a novel pharmacologic target for the design of antibiotic drugs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 312(2), 417–423 (2005). •• Provides comprehensive information on quorum sensing.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Dong Y-H, Gusti AR, Zhang Q, Xu J-L, Zhang L-H. Identification of quorum-quenching N-acyl homoserine lactonases from Bacillus species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68(4), 1754–1759 (2002). •• Identified the N-acyl homoserine lactonases from a bacterium.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Lin YH, Xu JL, Hu J et al. Acyl-homoserine lactone acylase from Ralstonia strain XJ12B represents a novel and potent class of quorum-quenching enzymes. Mol. Microbiol. 47(3), 849–860 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12 Delalande L, Faure D, Raffoux A et al. N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone, a mediator of bacterial quorum-sensing regulation, exhibits plant-dependent stability and may be inactivated by germinating Lotus corniculatus seedlings. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 52(1), 13–20 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Yates EA, Philipp B, Buckley C et al. N-acylhomoserine lactones undergo lactonolysis in a pH-, temperature-, and acyl chain length-dependent manner during growth of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 70(10), 5635–5646 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Grandclément C, Tannières M, Moréra S, Dessaux Y, Faure D. Quorum quenching: role in nature and applied developments. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 40(1), 86–116 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Paul D, Gopal J, Kumar M, Manikandan M. Nature to the natural rescue: silencing microbial chats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 280, 86–98 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16 Teplitski M, Robinson JB, Bauer WD. Plants secrete substances that mimic bacterial N-acyl homoserine lactone signal activities and affect population density-dependent behaviors in associated bacteria. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13(6), 637–648 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gopu V, Kothandapani S, Shetty PH. Quorum quenching activity of Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels and its anthocyanin malvidin against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Pathogenesis 79, 61–69 (2015). • Studied the effect of phytochemicals on quorum quenching.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Pejin B, Ciric A, Glamoclija J, Nikolic M, Sokovic M. In vitro anti-quorum sensing activity of phytol. Nat. Prod. Res. 29(4), 374–377 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19 Vandeputte OM, Kiendrebeogo M, Rajaonson S et al. Identification of catechin as one of the flavonoids from Combretum albiflorum bark extract that reduces the production of quorum-sensing-controlled virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(1), 243–253 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Vikram A, Jesudhasan PR, Pillai SD, Patil BS. Isolimonic acid interferes with Escherichia coli O157: H7 biofilm and TTSS in QseBC and QseA dependent fashion. BMC Microbiol. 12(1), 261 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Defoirdt T, Brackman G, Coenye T. Quorum sensing inhibitors: how strong is the evidence? Trends Microbiol. 21(12), 619–624 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Gorske BC, Blackwell HE. Interception of quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus: a new niche for peptidomimetics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 4(8), 1441–1445 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 Kalia VC, Wood TK, Kumar P. Evolution of resistance to quorum-sensing inhibitors. Microb. Ecol. 68(1), 13–23 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Fernandes R, Roy V, Wu H-C, Bentley WE. Engineered biological nanofactories trigger quorum sensing response in targeted bacteria. Nat. Nanotechnology 5(3), 213 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Nafee N, Husari A, Maurer CK et al. Antibiotic-free nanotherapeutics: ultra-small, mucus-penetrating solid lipid nanoparticles enhance the pulmonary delivery and anti-virulence efficacy of novel quorum sensing inhibitors. J. Control. Rel. 192, 131–140 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Qais FA, Khan MS, Ahmad I. Nanoparticles as quorum sensing inhibitor: prospects and limitations. In: Biotechnological Applications of Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Kalia V(Ed.). Springer, Singapore, 227–244 (2018). •• Provides the information on quorum quenching potential of nanoparticles (NPs).
  Google Scholar
• 27 Ramasamy M, Lee J. Recent nanotechnology approaches for prevention and treatment of biofilm-associated infections on medical devices. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 1–17 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 28 Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO, Bach H. Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 15(1), 65 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29 Besinis A, De Peralta T, Handy RD. The antibacterial effects of silver, titanium dioxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles compared to the dental disinfectant chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans using a suite of bioassays. Nanotoxicology 8(1), 1–16 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Leung YH, Ng AM, Xu X et al. Mechanisms of antibacterial activity of MgO: non-ROS mediated toxicity of MgO nanoparticles towards Escherichia coli. Small 10(6), 1171–1183 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 McQuillan JS, Groenaga Infante H, Stokes E, Shaw AM. Silver nanoparticle enhanced silver ion stress response in Escherichia coli K12. Nanotoxicology 6(8), 857–866 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Thill A, Zeyons O, Spalla O et al. Cytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles for Escherichia coli. Physico-chemical insight of the cytotoxicity mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 40(19), 6151–6156 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 De Jong WH, Borm PJ. Drug delivery and nanoparticles: applications and hazards. Int. J. Nanomed. 3(2), 133 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Tsuji JS, Maynard AD, Howard PC et al. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part IV: risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxicol. Sci. 89(1), 42–50 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35 Zimper U, Aaltonen J, McGoverin CM, Gordon KC, Krauel-Goellner K, Rades T. Quantification of process induced disorder in milled samples using different analytical techniques. Pharmaceutics 2(1), 30–49 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Elsaesser A, Howard CV. Toxicology of nanoparticles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64(2), 129–137 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Blair JM, Webber MA, Baylay AJ, Ogbolu DO, Piddock LJ. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13(1), 42 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Annous BA, Fratamico PM, Smith JL. Scientific status summary: quorum sensing in biofilms: why bacteria behave the way they do. J. Food Sci. 74(1), R24–R37 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Atkinson S, Chang C-Y, Sockett RE, Cámara M, Williams P. Quorum sensing in Yersinia enterocolitica controls swimming and swarming motility. J. Bacteriol. 188(4), 1451–1461 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Daniels R, Vanderleyden J, Michiels J. Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28(3), 261–289 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Von Bodman SB, Bauer WD, Coplin DL. Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 41(1), 455–482 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Zhu J, Winans SC. The quorum-sensing transcriptional regulator TraR requires its cognate signaling ligand for protein folding, protease resistance, and dimerization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 98(4), 1507–1512 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Seed PC, Passador L, Iglewski BH. Activation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasI gene by LasR and the Pseudomonas autoinducer PAI: an autoinduction regulatory hierarchy. J. Bacteriol. 177(3), 654–659 (1995).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44 Case RJ, Labbate M, Kjelleberg S. AHL-driven quorum-sensing circuits: their frequency and function among the Proteobacteria. ISME J. 2(4), 345 (2008). • Investigated the quorum sensing in proteobacteria.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Brint JM, Ohman DE. Synthesis of multiple exoproducts in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is under the control of RhlR-RhlI, another set of regulators in strain PAO1 with homology to the autoinducer-responsive LuxR-LuxI family. J. Bacteriol. 177(24), 7155–7163 (1995).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Thomson N, Crow M, McGowan S, Cox A, Salmond G. Biosynthesis of carbapenem antibiotic and prodigiosin pigment in Serratia is under quorum sensing control. Mol. Microbiol. 36(3), 539–556 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Sadekuzzaman M, Yang S, Mizan M, Ha S. Current and recent advanced strategies for combating biofilms. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 14(4), 491–509 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 48 Castellano JJ, Shafii SM, Ko F et al. Comparative evaluation of silver-containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs. Int. Wound J. 4(2), 114–122 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 49 Chen X, Schluesener HJ. Nanosilver: a nanoproduct in medical application. Toxicol. Lett. 176(1), 1–12 (2008). • Describes the use of silver NPs in medical science
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Brandt O, Mildner M, Egger AE et al. Nanoscalic silver possesses broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities and exhibits fewer toxicological side effects than silver sulfadiazine. Nanomedicine 8(4), 478–488 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN et al. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 3(1), 95–101 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52 Lara HH, Garza-Treviño EN, Ixtepan-Turrent L, Singh DK. Silver nanoparticles are broad-spectrum bactericidal and virucidal compounds. J. Nanobiotechnol. 9(1), 30 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Naik K, Chatterjee A, Prakash H, Kowshik M. Mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles containing Ag ion with excellent antimicrobial activity at remarkable low silver concentrations. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 9(4), 664–673 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Panáček A, Kvitek L, Prucek R et al. Silver colloid nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and their antibacterial activity. J. Phys. Chem. B 110(33), 16248–16253 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55 Khurana C, Sharma P, Pandey O, Chudasama B. Synergistic effect of metal nanoparticles on the antimicrobial activities of antibiotics against biorecycling microbes. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32(6), 524–532 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Martinez-Castanon G, Nino-Martinez N, Martinez-Gutierrez F, Martinez-Mendoza J, Ruiz F. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles with different sizes. J. Nanopart. Res. 10(8), 1343–1348 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Ruparelia JP, Chatterjee AK, Duttagupta SP, Mukherji S. Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 4(3), 707–716 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58 Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 275(1), 177–182 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Jagtap S, Priolkar K. Evaluation of ZnO nanoparticles and study of ZnO–TiO2 composites for lead free humidity sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 183, 411–418 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 60 Ravindran D, Ramanathan S, Arunachalam K, Jeyaraj GP, Shunmugiah KP, Arumugam VR. Phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles as antiquorum sensing and antibiofilm agent against the nosocomial pathogen Serratia marcescens: an in vitro study. J. Appl. Microbiol. 124(6), 1425–1440 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61 Ali SG, Ansari MA, Jamal QMS et al. Antiquorum sensing activity of silver nanoparticles in P. aeruginosa: an in silico study. In silico Pharmacol. 5(1), 12 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 62 Singh R, Shedbalkar UU, Wadhwani SA, Chopade BA. Bacteriagenic silver nanoparticles: synthesis, mechanism, and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99(11), 4579–4593 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63 Giasuddin A, Jhuma K, Haq AM. Use of gold nanoparticles in diagnostics, surgery and medicine: a review. Bangladesh J. Med. Biochem. 5(2), 56–60 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 64 Jain S, Hirst D, O'Sullivan J. Gold nanoparticles as novel agents for cancer therapy. Br. J. Radiol. 85(1010), 101–113 (2012). •• Provides the information on use of gold NPs in cancer.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65 Mesbahi A. A review on gold nanoparticles radiosensitization effect in radiation therapy of cancer. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 15(6), 176–180 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 66 Capek I. Preparation and functionalization of gold nanoparticles. J. Surf. Sci. Technol. 29, 1–18 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 67 Ahmad A, Senapati S, Khan MI et al. Intracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles by a novel alkalotolerant actinomycete, Rhodococcus species. Nanotechnology 14(7), 824 (2003).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 68 Almeida JPM, Figueroa ER, Drezek RA. Gold nanoparticle mediated cancer immunotherapy. Nanomedicine 10(3), 503–514 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69 Bindhu M, Umadevi M. Antibacterial activities of green synthesized gold nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 120, 122–125 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 70 Li X, Robinson SM, Gupta A et al. Functional gold nanoparticles as potent antimicrobial agents against multi-drug-resistant bacteria. ACS Nano 8(10), 10682–10686 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71 Lima E, Guerra R, Lara V, Guzmán A. Gold nanoparticles as efficient antimicrobial agents for Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi. Chemistry Cent. J. 7(1), 11 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72 Zhao Y, Tian Y, Cui Y, Liu W, Ma W, Jiang X. Small molecule-capped gold nanoparticles as potent antibacterial agents that target gram-negative bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132(35), 12349–12356 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 73 Vinoj G, Pati R, Sonawane A, Vaseeharan B. In vitro cytotoxic effects of gold nanoparticles coated with functional acyl homoserine lactone lactonase protein from Bacillus licheniformis and their antibiofilm activity against Proteus species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59(2), 763–771 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 74 Bai F, Han Y, Chen J, Zhang X-H. Disruption of quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi by the AiiA protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. Aquaculture 274(1), 36–40 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 75 Kaufmann GF, Sartorio R, Lee S-H et al. Revisiting quorum sensing: discovery of additional chemical and biological functions for 3-oxo-N-acylhomoserine lactones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 102(2), 309–314 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 76 Samanta S, Singh BR, Adholeya A. Intracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles using an ectomycorrhizal strain EM-1083 of Laccaria fraterna and its nanoanti-quorum sensing potential against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Indian J. Microbiol. 57(4), 448–460 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 77 Banerjee AN. The design, fabrication, and photocatalytic utility of nanostructured semiconductors: focus on TiO2-based nanostructures. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 4, 35 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78 Shah MSAS, Nag M, Kalagara T, Singh S, Manorama SV. Silver on PEG-PU-TiO2 polymer nanocomposite films: an excellent system for antibacterial applications. Chem. Mater. 20(7), 2455–2460 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 79 Cho K-H, Park J-E, Osaka T, Park S-G. The study of antimicrobial activity and preservative effects of nanosilver ingredient. Electrochim. Acta 51(5), 956–960 (2005).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 80 Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 1(1), 1–21 (2000).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 81 Shiraishi Y, Hirai T. Selective organic transformations on titanium oxide-based photocatalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 9(4), 157–170 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 82 Naik K, Kowshik M. Anti-quorum sensing activity of AgCl-TiO2 nanoparticles with potential use as active food packaging material. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117(4), 972–983 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 83 Malvindi MA, Brunetti V, Vecchio G, Galeone A, Cingolani R, Pompa PP. SiO2 nanoparticles biocompatibility and their potential for gene delivery and silencing. Nanoscale 4(2), 486–495 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84 Wang L, Benicewicz BC. Synthesis and characterization of dye-labeled poly (methacrylic acid) grafted silica nanoparticles. ACS Macro Lett. 2(2), 173–176 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 85 Chu Z, Huang Y, Li L, Tao Q, Li Q. Physiological pathway of human cell damage induced by genotoxic crystalline silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33(30), 7540–7546 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 86 Chu Z, Huang Y, Tao Q, Li Q. Cellular uptake, evolution, and excretion of silica nanoparticles in human cells. Nanoscale 3(8), 3291–3299 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 87 Tang L, Cheng J. Nonporous silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine application. Nano Today 8(3), 290–312 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88 Miller KP. Bacterial communication and its role as a target for nanoparticle-based antimicrobial therapy. (2015). •• An overview of NP based antimicrobial therapy.
  Google Scholar
• 89 Sawai J, Yoshikawa T. Quantitative evaluation of antifungal activity of metallic oxide powders (MgO, CaO and ZnO) by an indirect conductimetric assay. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96(4), 803–809 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 90 Tomczak MM, Gupta MK, Drummy LF, Rozenzhak SM, Naik RR. Morphological control and assembly of zinc oxide using a biotemplate. Acta Biomater. 5(3), 876–882 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91 Esakkimuthu T, Sivakumar D, Akila S. Application of nanoparticles in wastewater treatment. Pollut. Res. 33(03), 567–571 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 92 Horie M, Nishio K, Fujita K et al. Protein adsorption of ultrafine metal oxide and its influence on cytotoxicity toward cultured cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 22(3), 543–553 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 93 Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S, Benedetti MF, Fiévet F. Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett. 6(4), 866–870 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 94 Yamamoto O. Influence of particle size on the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide. Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 3(7), 643–646 (2001).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 95 Al-Shabib NA, Husain FM, Hassan I et al. Biofabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticle from ochradenus baccatus leaves: broad-spectrum antibiofilm activity, protein binding studies, and in vivo toxicity and stress studies. J. Nanomater. 2018, 1–14 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 96 García-Lara B, Saucedo-Mora M, Roldán-Sánchez J et al. Inhibition of quorum-sensing-dependent virulence factors and biofilm formation of clinical and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains by ZnO nanoparticles. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 61(3), 299–305 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 97 Al-Shabib NA, Husain FM, Ahmed F et al. Biogenic synthesis of Zinc oxide nanostructures from Nigella sativa seed: prospective role as food packaging material inhibiting broad-spectrum quorum sensing and biofilm. Sci. Rep. 6, 36761 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 98 Vilar Junior JC, Ribeaux DR, Alves Da Silva CA, Campos-Takaki D, Maria G. Physicochemical and antibacterial properties of chitosan extracted from waste shrimp shells. Int. J. Microbiol. 2016, 1–7 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 99 Younes I, Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Mar. Drugs 13(3), 1133–1174 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 100 Kong M, Chen XG, Xing K, Park HJ. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144(1), 51–63 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101 Kaya M, Baran T, Asan-Ozusaglam M et al. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities from cosmopolitan Orthoptera species (Insecta). Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng. 20(1), 168–179 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 102 Ngamviriyavong P, Thananuson A, Pankongadisak P, Tanjak P, Janvikul W. Antibacterial hydrogels from chitosan derivatives. J. Metals Mater. Miner. 20(3), 113–117 (2010).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 103 Wardani G, Sudjarwo SA. In vitro antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles against mycobacterium tuberculosis. Pharmacogn. J. 10(1), 162–166 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 104 Omwenga E, Hensel A, Shitandi A, Goycoolea F. Chitosan nanoencapsulation of flavonoids enhances their quorum sensing and biofilm formation inhibitory activities against an E. coli Top 10 biosensor. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 164, 125–133 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105 Ilk S, Sağlam N, Özgen M, Korkusuz F. Chitosan nanoparticles enhances the anti-quorum sensing activity of kaempferol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 94, 653–662 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106 Qin X, Engwer C, Desai S, Vila-Sanjurjo C, Goycoolea FM. An investigation of the interactions between an E. coli bacterial quorum sensing biosensor and chitosan-based nanocapsules. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 149, 358–368 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107 Jeng HA, Swanson J. Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in mammalian cells. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 41(12), 2699–2711 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 108 Johnston HJ, Hutchison G, Christensen FM, Peters S, Hankin S, Stone V. A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 40(4), 328–346 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 109 Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4(1), 26–49 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 110 Donaldson K, Brown D, Clouter A et al. The pulmonary toxicology of ultrafine particles. J. Aerosol Med. 15(2), 213–220 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 111 Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K et al. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2(1), 1 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 112 Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A et al. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ. Health Perspect. 111(4), 455 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113 Møller P, Jacobsen NR, Folkmann JK et al. Role of oxidative damage in toxicity of particulates. Free Radic. Res. 44(1), 1–46 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 114 Koeneman BA, Zhang Y, Westerhoff P, Chen Y, Crittenden JC, Capco DG. Toxicity and cellular responses of intestinal cells exposed to titanium dioxide. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 26(3), 225–238 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 115 L'azou B, Henge-Napoli M-H, Minaro L, Mirto H, Barrouillet M-P, Cambar J. Effects of cadmium and uranium on some in vitro renal targets. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 18(5), 329–340 (2002).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 116 Elder A, Oberdörster G. Translocation and effects of ultrafine particles outside of the lung. Clin. Occup. Environ. Med. 5(4), 785–796 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 117 Hillyer JF, Albrecht RM. Gastrointestinal persorption and tissue distribution of differently sized colloidal gold nanoparticles. J. Pharma. Sci. 90(12), 1927–1936 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 118 Semmler M, Seitz J, Erbe F et al. Long-term clearance kinetics of inhaled ultrafine insoluble iridium particles from the rat lung, including transient translocation into secondary organs. Inhal. Toxicol. 16(6-7), 453–459 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119 Wang J, Zhou G, Chen C et al. Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol. Lett. 168(2), 176–185 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 120 Han D, Tian Y, Zhang T, Ren G, Yang Z. Nano-zinc oxide damages spatial cognition capability via over-enhanced long-term potentiation in hippocampus of Wistar rats. Int. J. Nanomedicine 6, 1453 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 121 Hu R, Zheng L, Zhang T et al. Molecular mechanism of hippocampal apoptosis of mice following exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 191(1–3), 32–40 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 122 Heydrnejad MS, Samani RJ, Aghaeivanda S. Toxic effects of silver nanoparticles on liver and some hematological parameters in male and female mice (Mus musculus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 165(2), 153–158 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 123 Ramadi KB, Mohamed YA, Al-Sbiei A et al. Acute systemic exposure to silver-based nanoparticles induces hepatotoxicity and NLRP3-dependent inflammation. Nanotoxicology 10(8), 1061–1074 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 124 Pujalté I, Passagne I, Brouillaud B et al. Cytotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by different metallic nanoparticles on human kidney cells. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 8(1), 1 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 125 Xie H, Mason MM, Wise JP. Genotoxicity of metal nanoparticles. Rev. Environ. Health 26(4), 251–268 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 126 Jamuna BA, Ravishankar RV. Environmental risk, human health, and toxic effects of nanoparticles. Nanomater. Environ. Prot. 523–535 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• 127 Mckee MS, Filser J. Impacts of metal-based engineered nanomaterials on soil communities. Environ. Sci. 3(3), 506–533 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 128 Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Latta DE et al. CuO and ZnO nanoparticles: phytotoxicity, metal speciation, and induction of oxidative stress in sand-grown wheat. J. Nanopart. Res. 14(9), 1125 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 129 El-Temsah YS, Joner EJ. Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. Environ. Toxicol. 27(1), 42–49 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 130 Ghosh M, Bhadra S, Adegoke A, Bandyopadhyay M, Mukherjee A. MWCNT uptake in Allium cepa root cells induces cytotoxic and genotoxic responses and results in DNA hyper-methylation. Mutat. Res. 774, 49–58 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 131 Riahi MA, Rezaee F, Jalali V. Effects of alumina nanoparticles on morphological properties and antioxidant system of Triticum aestivum. 3(1), 595–603 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 132 Yan S, Zhao L, Li H et al. Single-walled carbon nanotubes selectively influence maize root tissue development accompanied by the change in the related gene expression. J. Hazard. Mater. 246, 110–118 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 133 Bahadar H, Maqbool F, Niaz K, Abdollahi M. Toxicity of nanoparticles and an overview of current experimental models. Iranian Biomed. J. 20(1), 1 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar